"It operates like much like a regular quadcopter drone, except that it can move in any direction at a moment's notice."
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that *exactly* what quadcopter drones do?
Yeah the text description going on here is garbage. And of course this thing would make a sonic boom if it was scaled up to be able to install jet engines with enough thrust.
And that's the reason why the shape of the object shouldn't be the only reason to think something is anomalous.
Because except for the shape, this object is extremely ordinary.
Yes I was going to say, this moves just like a drone and if most people saw it, its clear what it is. Now if were doing 1k mph and stopping on a dime, I'd be questioning it.
This has been in development for years too. There's also lots of toy drones made to look like flying saucers. It's the reason why clips of small dots and saucer like objects in the sky need to be heavily scrutinized. Unless an object is performing physic breaking manoeuvres it's most likely just balloons or drones.
>Unless an object is performing physic breaking manoeuvres it's most likely just balloons or drones.
Not true. I've seen stuff move like normal and hover and completely de-materialise and rematerialise in the sky. Is that a balloon or a drone?
The giveaway will be the noise and the not so precise maneuvering.
Also the travelling under 10 seconds into space
Nice that the original noise it makes is replaced by tinkly music. You'd hear this coming a mile away, it's like a hairdryer on steroids
It makes me glad I saw my sighting in 2010 and I know for certain it wasn’t a drone, wasn’t a civilian aircraft (my dad is a pilot and the nearest airport was closed at the time), and it was unique as it happened during a snowstorm.
Here’s the link to the report I wrote so long ago now. If you’re interested.
If 9 out of 10 users on this board saw that in the air they would be shitting themselves to report this alien encounter.
Just a quad drone with a shell. Cool looking though
Only idiots fall for that stuff.
It’s the crafts moving instantaneously 3,000+ MPH that eliminates ALL possible man made crafts
"That's one noisy UFO".
"It's a drone".
Im ready to scare the F out of my neighbors with this thing
Does it turn at right angles when doing mach 20?
Probably had this technology in use for 50+ years
You are correct, just to clarify it's been over 70+ years now.
Quite fancy one of those.
Just ordered my monocle from Amazon.
The video says it's not on sale, so it's technically not "out there".
This seems to be a difference of opinion on what the term "out there" means.
If I may (with fictional examples, so that I don't run the risk of a temper tantrum):
* One definition means "available" and "in the wild". (There are drones out there.)
* Another definition means "beyond what most people would consider sane". (Wow, this whole idea of UFO drones is really out there!)
* Yet another means "somewhere within the scope of reality". (In spite of this UFO drone, I still believe the truth is out there.)
And there are other, even more colloquial definitions.
All of these are perfectly valid. So, where one is using one meaning, another is asserting a different one, which only confuses the topic, rather than clarifying meaning so that the topic can be discussed.
In other words, refusing to see another's meaning kinda kills the topic, in spite of being a bit on the lulzy side. Just so people are aware.
At this point the only believable footage would be a big ship landing in the middle of somewhere and everyone being able to see it and everyone recording it and it being broadcast on every news outlet
So you advocate for "guilty until proven innocent"? Because it's the same logic: amazing until proven ordinary.
This is why I’m not convinced by any video anymore unless the object is doing some insane physics defying movements
You know what annoys me about things like this. Your sceptics will use things like these as proof to debunk all sorts of things. Mick West NDT are the worst 2 imo.
this shows how little you know.
Mick isnt the type who just screams fake and pulls something out of his ass.
if you would actually read some discussions on metabunk you would realize how often Mick remembers its members to not interpret or make something fit just to support a believe or call it a day because an alleged explanation was found.
no one can claim something was debunked just because something exists that look similar. you need to identify it properly but can use it as a working theory. if you fail to provide evidence than its still unidentified at this point.
you are talking about idiots with a strong bias. they exist on both sides. believers who see ET in every light, even if its labeled "American Airlines" when zoomed in and debunkers who scream mylard ballon even if the gray is fingering their assholes at the moment.
Ok but UFOs are much bigger and don't play Mission Impossible music as they fly around like this one did. But seriously this thing probably is loud AF like a weed wacker and it is limited with its movement. It doesn't go 80000 feet to 20000 feet in a second. These also have obvious methods of propulsion while UFOs don't.
>Ok but UFOs are much bigger
Any examples? do you know how big they are from what data?
Not 50 years ago there wasnt
Jeremy McGowan does a good job demonstrating drone tech that is out there and on design tables. Really is an eye opener. Stuff like this barely scratches the surface
Sure is some unexplainable physics.
Don’t forget the cost of a large drone. I doubt a lot of people will drop a few thousand for one
This is clearly alien technology👽, so... Are aliens posting on reddit now?!? 😨
And they are over the world and fly and tremendous speeds, light up at night, and out fly all other things in the sky! Drones!!! Are the answer to all the UFO videos!!
So its a Quadcopter that looks like a saucer ?
LOL good luck making that thing go supersonic with that shape.
Its a cute quadcopter with a chassis attached to change its profile.
Reminds me of those tiny UFOs helping the old couples in an old Disney film (not animated).
I build these drones except they don’t look like a ufo. That’s just a shell. And yes it (can move on all axis’) in comparison to a drone that is limited to flying forward or back. This just looks like an overpriced project. You can build these types of drones by buying parts on aliexpress for like sub 200$$ at this point and no it cannot rotate while stationary, it uses 4 blades individually when rotating so for example as its free falling when you turn the stick only one or two of the blades would power up — causing the drone to rotate fully in the given direction BUT it will be declining altitude while doing so, not remaining stationary lmfao. I do encourage all of you to pick it up as a hobby though, it’s super fun. I know a couple people who quit their drug habits because of the dopamine they get doing it FPV off cliffs and stuff, pretty fun tech, but old
We will never discover the truth
It's not quite inertia-less and how exactly wouldn't it make sonic booms? It's literally impossible to not create booms with our conventional tech surely?
Imagine they have this copyrighted, and as soon as an Alien makes contact. They get a lawsuit.
I get the point of the post, but I really do feel offended by the chiding attitude.
Yes. They exist. Yes, people post videos of IFOs all the time.
I drove underneath a giant disk that was at least 150' wide, it was going 80 or 90mph.
It almost hit a small civilian aircraft, and was over a densely populated area.
It wasnt a bird, it wasnt a blimp, it wasnt a hologram.
Be skeptical? Be reasonable.
Not likely for a quadcopter to break the sound barrier
Not possible to break the sound barrier and not create a sonic boom
This is just a classic flying saucer shaped shroud they placed over an existing commercial drone.
I think it’s proof that all this made up
Does it negate g force cause that’s the impressive part of UFOs
Does it accelerate to thousands of MPH in seconds?
And that's part of why, when people ask if I've seen a UFO, I say "I see UFOs every day. I'm assuming most of them are planes."
At this point I'm done with the anticipation and blue balling. Keep hearing about this incredible and definitive high resolution video that is going to drop any day now.
Yes but it can’t fly 50,000 mph in the air
I’ll bet if you send this promotional video to Jeremy Corbell he’ll post it
Claiming that thing goes supersonic is so b.s lol
Now imagine this at the military level…
This is just a quadcopter with an inefficient housing
the thing about not doing a sonic boom with the right jets is hogwash. Everything that passes the speed of sound in the air produces a sonic boom. the sonic boom is just a shockwabe produced by an object going faster than the disturbance it creates by moving through air. Rockets launched for space make a glorious sonic boom.
I am the most sceptical person when it comes to anything related. Not saying i dont believe, because i do believe, but i dont believe everything that i can recognize right away to be a ufo or an alien
>With the right jets there would be no traditional sonic boom when it goes transonic or supersonic
This is bullshit, it’s not even powered by jets it’s just a quadcopter. And you can’t just make something that doesn’t create a sonic boom it’s not possible. Even with huge quiet spikes like NASA are testing you can only make “low boom” aircraft. I’ve studied aerodynamics and there is absolutely nothing about this aircraft which would make it not create sonic booms.
>it operates much like a quadcopter drone only it move in any direction at a moments notice
So exactly like a quadcopter drone.
Cute, now what is this design based on?
Itself? Let the timeloop begin.
Come back when it does it at 13,000 mph after hovering in place for 9 hours.
Now make it drop 80,000 feet in 5 seconds and we’ll have a deal.
This just reads like a load of Kickstarter BS. I didn't see anything exceptional in this video. The shape could definitely fool some people though
This moves like a drone. With all of that material—meaning the dolphin tail airfoil—I can't see how it would be any more responsive than a high-end quad. And of course, there would be a sonic boom if you scaled it up and added jet engines. Plus, you know, it would ***have jet engines.***
This just reads like someone desperately trying to convince you that, "this can totally be mistaken for a UFO, bro," when in reality it's easily identifiable. Just because this might fool *you* doesn't mean it will fool all.
It wouldnt? Sure thing lmao
"Not a quadcopter"
Has four easily identifiable rotors.
It’s a quatcopter with ducted fans and a body shell. It’s short clips of low altitude flying because it doesn’t work. Imagine it having the stability of a falling piece of paper.
What exactly are they trying to prove anyway, it's doing what literally any basic drone can do.
Yeah like, 3
These things have been around for ages. I remember back in the 80's a whole bunch of them fixed up an old apartment block for free.
I saw a documentary on it.
that is a pizza plate with a fan.
did u see the movies leaked by the military? u cant accelerate like that using a fan or not even a jet engine.
Can it do Mach 30 right angle turn without reducing speed?
"This guy" lmao I dont think we are worried about a horseshoe crab shaped drone that clearly can barely stabilize. The ones they are said to have on radar going 150mph range dont interest me as much but the ones that are going 15,000 mph and making right turns and shit thats no misidentified drone.
If it's powered by shoving air around with jets or fans, it will be noisy.
ET vehicles are mostly silent, and can move about as if they have no inertia.
This would get my attention for sure, but I never assume something might be non-human unless I see it do something "impossible".
No ones gonna mistake this tiny fan powered piece of plastic for a ufo 🤣
Human technology is propulsion (pushed from the back) , alien 's is attraction (gravitation opens in the front)
What's there to be skeptical about? Government disclosed, a tiny bit but they said somethings out there, so why be skeptical? On the contrary open your mind more. We got machines that can collide particles together, that create a fraction of a black hole, create reusable energy, can hit past mach 5, ai that can drive itself. Just let go of the fear that we aren't the apex predators anymore. There's something out there much more advanced than us, and at this point in human life we kinda need the help.
What do you mean? I love the UFO topic like you, all i'm saying is to not jump on conclusions and to analyze carefully everything you see
Dude this is at minimum 3-4 years before there is EVEN a chance these will be available to the public. This is a equivalent of a click bait post saying “be skeptical of Bigfoot because there are silver back gorillas out there” just because something in some way is similar does not mean it is an explanation. That is probably a single proto type or at max 15 in production. Definitely in no possible way any UFO’s we are seeing in any videos posted. Again shameful clickbait equivalent post.
A community for discussion related to Unidentified Flying Objects. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. We aim to elevate good research while maintaining healthy skepticism.