Yeah, that's gonna be a no for me, dawg
Considering he molested his sisters, I don’t think his family is safe from him either.
Calling this guy pond scum is an insult to pond scum.
He touched his sisters. Who's to say he won't touch.his kids.
Who’s to say he hasn’t?
Urgh. TV personality on "19 kids and counting", Republican political activist, and director of a lobbying group sponsored by the "Family Research Council", pedophile and serial incestuous molester?
Still, I live in the UK. We can't really talk. We had Jimmy Saville who never faced justice in his lifetime and who supported the tory party.
All of these right-wing paedos and Qanon *still* believe that the pedo networks are left wing.
yep. they're defending the shit out of matt gaetz or just ignoring the issue.
Why is that flagged as erotic / over-18 content? lmao
But they have an appointment for family photographs. They can’t cancel and they’ll loose their deposit.
>But they have an appointment for family photographs. They can’t cancel and they’ll loose their deposit.
Loose deposits suck.
As long has he gets castrated... shouldn't be an issue.
Edit: This was a terrible emotional response on my part. I rather expected to be downvoted to oblivion upon waking up today. Not only is it cruel, it is ineffective. What happened to Turing and somewhat relatedly "A Clockwork Orange" should have taught me better than this.
If I believed his predilection was hormonally driven, I would agree that chemical castration would be an option. However, I believe in this case and in many cases of child abuse, it's driven by control issues and childhood experiences.
Castration would not necessarily protect the children in his life from his need to be in control of them. He may not use his penis, but that doesn't mean the abuse would stop.
Well hell, judges are doing far worse things these days with sex offenders.
Offbeat: funny, weird, sad, strange or quirky news that's just....just offbeat :)